Hicks * 02 Oct 2018 23:08:36 * Modified at 23:35:13
Something that I have never looked at closely... but some of you did it! I think in particular to Madram, Offset and Grim. Knowledge sharing thread!
On CRTC 1, we can do a kind of "delta-RVI": since the Memory Adress (MA) is readed when C4=C0=0 (VCC=HCC=0), then, even if we display the bloc 0 (C9=0, i.e. VLC=0) then the bloc 1, no invisible vertical splitting is necessary, we just have to put the new MA and R9=1. If we must display bloc 0 then 4, we put 3 invisible screens (1-2-3) and set MA is ok too.
But on CRTC 0, we can't do that because MA is readed only when C4=C0=C9=0, I mean, we MUST pass upon a bloc 0 (C9=0). But the rumor says that all the sequences are no longer possible on this CRTC (possible to use the bloc 7?), and that there is strange comportments...
I know that Offset analyzed this for ACE (CRTC 0 emulation is 100% accurate I think), Madram too for his incoming demo, and the bearded mole, hmm... analyze everthing :)
On CRTC 1, we can do a kind of "delta-RVI": since the Memory Adress (MA) is readed when C4=C0=0 (VCC=HCC=0), then, even if we display the bloc 0 (C9=0, i.e. VLC=0) then the bloc 1, no invisible vertical splitting is necessary, we just have to put the new MA and R9=1. If we must display bloc 0 then 4, we put 3 invisible screens (1-2-3) and set MA is ok too.
But on CRTC 0, we can't do that because MA is readed only when C4=C0=C9=0, I mean, we MUST pass upon a bloc 0 (C9=0). But the rumor says that all the sequences are no longer possible on this CRTC (possible to use the bloc 7?), and that there is strange comportments...
I know that Offset analyzed this for ACE (CRTC 0 emulation is 100% accurate I think), Madram too for his incoming demo, and the bearded mole, hmm... analyze everthing :)